STUDY NOTES POST #1: STUDY ON CS JOSEPH GRID
Study conducted on the CS Joseph grid summer 2021
This study was conducted using 180 personalities that were present in my night time dreams from approximately 1986- 2010. These personalities were likely those of people I knew, but they just had different names and appearances in my dreams. They were spontaneously living their lives in my dreams, and I was sleeping, I was not influencing the outcome of the situations I dreamed in my dreams. For about a decade, I had wanted to do a mass typing of my "dream people" , in order to better understand their interactions. I watched a video about the CS Joseph grid last spring, and figured it would be a great tool to use for such a mass typing. So I typed 180 of my "dream people" using it. But a short time later, CS Joseph lost all credibility with me, as I delved deeper into his video library. What I uncovered called into question the accuracy of his grid, and all the typings I had just done on it. So I then went and retyped all the 180 "dream people", using DISC. I then used my then new, now seasoned, knowledge of Jung's functions to associate each DISC result with a Briggs Myers type. The summary of the study results follow. The correct type of the 180 dream people is whatever type they got in DISC and Jungian typology, regardless of if it coincided with the CS Joseph grid result or not. And trust me, for each person the CS Joseph grid mistyped, the DISC/Jungian arrived Briggs Myers type made a lot more sense, in all cases. Without further ado, here's the numbers:
Type Total Number + Number- %+ %-
Statistics Typed correctly- 78 Mistyped- 102 Accuracy rating- 43%
Correct typing statistics Highest totals- 9 (INTJ), 8 (ISFP/ ESFJ), 7 (ENFP/ ESFP), 6 (ISFJ/ ISTJ), 5 (ISTP/ INTP) Highest % correct- ENFP/ ENTJ - 100%, ISFP/ INFP - 67%, ESFJ - 62%, ISFJ/ INTJ - 60%
Mistyping Statistics Highest totals- 15 (ISTJ), 13 (ISTP), 12 (ENTP/ ESTJ), 9 (ESFP) Highest % mistypes- ESTJ - 92%, ENTP - 80%, ISTP- 72%, ISTJ - 71%, ESTP - 63%
Type Total Break-# Break-%
ISTP 10 INTJ-5, INTP-2, ISTJ-1, ESTJ-1, ESFP-1 50, 20, 10, 10, 10
ENTP 7 ESTP-4, ESTJ-1, ENFJ-1, INTP-1 57, 14, 14, 14
ENFP 7 ESTJ-3, ESFJ-1, ESFP-1, ISFP-1, INTJ-1 43, 14, 14, 14, 14
ESTJ 8 ENTP-6, ENFJ-2 75,25
ISFP 12 ISTP-3, INFJ-3, ISTJ-2, INTP-1, INFP-1, ESFP-1, 25, 25, 17, 8, 8, 8, 8
ENTP-1 INTJ 4 INTP-2, ISTP-1, ISTJ-1 50, 25, 25
ISTJ 11 ESTJ-4, ISTP-3, ISFP-2, ISFJ-1, ENTP-1 44, 33, 22, 11, 11
INTP 8 ISTP-6, INTJ-1, ESFP-1 75, 12.5, 12.5
INFP 11 ISTJ-6, ISFJ-3, ISFP-1, ESFJ-1 55, 27, 9, 9
ESTP 8 ENTP-5, ESTJ-2, ENFJ-1 62.5, 25, 12.5
ENFJ 4 ESFP-2, ESFJ-1, ESTP-1 50, 25,25
INFJ 1 ISTJ-1 100 ENTJ 0 0 100
Types for mistypes statistics Highest totals for mistype types- 12 (ISFP), 11 (ISTJ/INFP), 10 (ISTP)
Mistypes < or = 4- ISTP for INTJ, ENTP for ESTP, ESTJ for ENTP, ISTJ for ESTJ, INTP for ISTP, INFP for ISTJ, ISFJ for ISTJ, ESTP for ENTP
% < or = 50- INTJ- 50% of ISTP m.t., ESTP- 57% of ENTP m.t., ENTP- 75% of ESTJ m.t., ISTP- 50% of INTJ m.t., ISTP- 75% of INTP m.t., ISTJ- 100% of ISFJ m.t., ESFP- 100% of ESFJ m.t., ESFJ- 100% of ESFP m.t., ENTP- 62.5% of ESTP m.t., ESFP- 50% of ENFJ m.t., ISTJ- 100% of INFJ m.t.
Type Total Breakdown-# Breakdown-%
INTP 6 ISTP-3, INTJ-2, ENTP-1 50, 33, 17
ISFP 4 ENFP-1, ISTJ-2, INFP-1 25, 50, 25
INFJ 4 ISFP-3, INFP-1 75,25
ISTJ 15 INFP-6, ISFJ-4, ISFP-2, INFJ-1, ISTP-1, INTJ-1 40, 27, 13, 7, 7, 7
ISFJ 4 INFP-3, ISTJ-1 75, 25
ESFJ 5 ESFP-2, ENFP-1, ENFJ-1, INFP-1 40, 20, 20, 20
ESTP 5 ENTP-4, ENFJ-1 80, 20
ENFJ 4 ESTJ-2, ESTP-1, ENTP-1 50, 25, 25
ESFP 9 ESFJ-3, ENFJ-2, ISFP-1, ISTP-1, INTP-1, ENFP-1 33, 22, 11, 11, 11, 11
INTJ 7 ISTP-6, ENFP-1 86, 14
ISTP 13 INTP-6, ISFP-3, ISTJ-3, INTJ-1 46, 23,23,8
ENTP 12 ESTJ-5, ESTP-5, ISTJ-1, ISFP-1 42, 42,8,8
ESTJ 12 ISTJ-4, ISTP-1, ENFP-3, ESTP-2, ENFJ-1, ENTP-1 33, 8, 25, 16, 8, 8
Types mistyped statistics Highest totals for types mistyped- 15 (ISTJ), 13 (ISTP), 12 (ENTP/ ESTJ), 9 (ESFP)
Mistypes < or = 4- ISTJ as INFP, ISTJ as ISFJ, ESTP as ENTP, INTJ as ISTP, ISTP as INTP, ENTP as ESTJ, ENTP as ESTP, ESTJ as ISTJ
% < or = 50- 75% of INFJ m.t. are ISFP, 100% of INFP m.t. are ISFP, 75% of ISFJ m.t. are INFP, 80% of ESTP m.t. are ENTP, 86% of INTJ m.t. are ISTP, 50% of ENFJ m.t. are ESTJ
Common mistypes ISTJ→INFP ISTJ→ISFJ ESTP→ENTP INTJ→ISTP ISTP→INTP ENTP→ESTJ ENTP→ESTP ESTJ→ISTJ Correct type→mistype
One other statistic of note: 54 of the 102 mistypes are Latinos
After looking at these statistics, I was both surprised and horrified at the same time. I personally will no longer use the CS Joseph grid as a typing tool anymore, based on its 43% accuracy rate from the 180 person sample I threw at it. It only typed 78 of the 180 people correctly. From now on, I will use DISC assessments only. Why did the CS Joseph grid mistype 102 people? Here's my theories, in the order I feel they had an impact:
1. The CS Joseph grid attempts to place the 16 Briggs Myers types on a grid that has different dichotomies than the MBTI. The grid's dichotomies are the dichotomies of the 4 Greek Temperaments (extroversion vs introversion, neuroticism vs stability). Neuroticism vs stability is measured in the 4 Greek Temperaments, but not in the MBTI. As a result, when one tries to place the 16 Briggs Myers types on such a grid, one is basically categorizing whole populations of Briggs Myers types as either neurotic or stable. But the truth is, that since neuroticism vs stability is not measured in the MBTI, there are neurotic and stable people in all 16 types. So what happens if you're neurotic and have a categorized stable type, or you're stable and have a categorized neurotic type? You get mistyped. Plain and simple. I estimate this was a main factor, or a contributing factor, for nearly all the mistypes.
2. The CS Joseph grid makes incorrect correlations between traits and Kiersey types. For example, all Intellectuals are systematic. No, all NJs are systematic. Or all Artisans are pragmatic. No, all ETs and IFs are pragmatic. I estimate this was a main factor, or a contributing factor, for nearly all the mistypes.
3. The CS Joseph grid's interaction styles are not universal, and don't transcend cultural barriers. I believe the interaction styles on the grid are geared towards mainstream western culture, however, a large portion (about half) of the 180 people I typed on the grid interacted in ways typical of hispanic culture. This led to mistypes, because interactions between people in Hispanic culture and western culture are different. This was a main factor, or a contributing factor, for 54 mistypes.
4. There are stereotypes for each Briggs Myers type that end up getting associated with the wrong types after generations of common mistypes and associations with incorrect cognitive functions. For instance, about 75% of an ISTP type description actually describes an INTJ. Or about 65% of an ESFP type description actually describes an ESFJ. This was a main factor, or a contributing factor, for 42 mistypes