True Personality Typing

TYPING IN PRACTICE # 16: JENNIFER LOPEZ

Jennifer Lopez is the last of the 5 people I typed from watching CS Joseph videos.

The first time through the CS Joseph video, that I watched back in the summer of 2021, all I had enough knowledge about at the time, method-wise, was DISC. In looking for DISC characteristics in Jennifer, I could tell both D and I were above 50/50. I left the typing there at that time, and came back to it later, as I learned more about Jung's functions.

I came back to the typing about a year later, armed with knowledge of the functions. I found Jennifer to have Se as her dominant function, but her auxiliary seemed to alternate between Te and Fe, with Te being slightly more common.

Therefore I was able to determine that Jennifer's SOJT type is Se, and that she has a slight preference for T over F. Her DISC characteristics having both D and I above 50/50 would also be consistent with the SOJT type Se (preferring T >F).

So what does all this mean in MBTI terminology? It means that Jennifer Lopez is Se1, Te2 ( although that Te2 is by a thread). The DISC result going along with this SOJT type is D=I (-). The MBTI type represented by Se1, Te2 is ESTP.

Therefore, in summary, we can say that Jennifer Lopez has the D=I DISC profile with the result D=I (-), that her SOJT type is Se (preferring T > F, and that her MBTI type is ESTP

To learn more about the SOJT type Se (T>F), you can read my True Types mock interview with our dream friend, Rusty:

JUNGIAN TYPOLOGY POST #12: SOJT (SIMPLIFIED ORIGINAL JUNGIAN TYPOLOGY) TERMINOLOGY AND ANNOTATIONS

First of all, I have to apologize here, for not posting this sooner. And I apologize for making reference to , what I *should* have been calling "SOJT types" as "Jungian types". I will go back and change that everywhere in my blog that I feel it needs to be changed, for my blog to be easier to understand.

Second, whenever I make reference to "Jungian typology " on this blog, I am specifically making reference to SOJT, not to the MBTI or any other typology that roots itself in Psychological Types.

In SOJT, types are much more specific than they are in the MBTI. There are only 16 MBTI types. They represent only *16* of the *141* types of SOJT. The 141 types of SOJT *represent different patterns of differentiation of the conscious*.

The SOJT types are written out , much the way they are written in these articles:

If you notice, these people use SOJT annotation to indicate how the conscious is differentiated.

In SOJT, it is assumed that the conscious has the same attitude (except in undifferentiated attitude), which is why they write just Se-f for ESFP, and not Se-fe. We are dealing with SOJT here, which was never corrupted my Isabel Myers, folks

In undifferentiated attitude, it is assumed that the 2 conscious functions have both attitudes, hence why no attitude is indicated; they aren't e or i; they're both e and I, like in this example:

Going back to our ESFP example, (and perfect, because the differentiation pattern represented above could have been an ESFP) an SOJT practitioner would annotate the type as simply S-f, because there is no clear e/i preference in this person. On my "meet the Se-f family" post , I added "E>I" to show why this particular S-f is part of the Se-f family, as opposed to the Si-f family

In undifferentiated auxiliary, it is assumed that the person has both auxiliary functions in their conscious, and they are not indicated, once again, because that information is unclear. Going back to my ESFP example, an SOJT practitioner would annotate this type as simply Se, because there is no clear auxiliary in this person. On my "meet the Se-f family" post, I added "F>T" to show why this particular Se is part of the Se-f family, as opposed to the Se-t family.

Because of varying degrees of differentiation, people can test as "more than one type" in today's MBTI. Vendrah makes that clear in this article here:

It's because, as stated above, the MBTI types represent *only* the fully differentiated SOJT types. Therefore, anyone with a different kind of differentiation in SOJT can actually have fragments of 2 or more MBTI types in their MBTI function test

One of these differentiation patterns,that can lead to this, is a differentiation pattern I've discovered, that also gets its own unique DISC results. I've come to call this differentiation the "double dominant ", because it too, like the undifferentiated auxiliary, has 3 conscious functions, and the person switches dominance between function 1 and function 2 with what they're focused on at the time. I don't know how SOJT would annotate this specific differentiation , but I just annotate it like, going back to our ESFP example , I annotated it as Se-f/Fe-n, representing, the fact that this person has conscious Se, Fe and Ne, and that the Fe can sometimes be triggered to act as the dominant function.

There is also a phenomenon in typing called "short primary, long secondary " that Vendrah talks about in both articles of hers I posted. I mentioned in the typing in practice post on Pink, that, for an ESFP, if you're analyzing their functions or testing them in any way in SOJT, their functions would come out Fe Se Ti Ni. I also mentioned that that's why it's always important to note the x4 when testing/analyzing other people, because you can get situations where the dominant and auxiliary functions are switched, particularly on tests. In our ESFP example, an SOJT practitioner would annotate this as Fe-s. I, however, think I might go back, and modify my annotations to fe-S, to add a little clarity to the situation.

Also, Jung *did in fact say* in Psychological Types, that it is possible for people to have 3 conscious functions. A misconceptions of Jung page on Facebook reminded me that I had in fact read that somewhere in Psychological Types, by mentioning it themselves in a post or comment. When I actually can find where Jung mentioned that, I'll make it clear here.

And here we go:

So, in summary, that's a wrap of a lot of the SOJT terminology and annotations you will see me using on this blog. Anyone who tells you these concepts do not exist, or are wrong knows nothing about SOJT, and doesn't understand the system